Proposal for Improving Student Performance and Satisfaction through Reduced Timeframes for Instructor Feedback
Introduction
Statement of Problem
In traditional, 16-week college courses, students have a window of opportunity to study their professor’s unique styles, expectations, and backgrounds, all of which are factors in how instructors grade course tasks. However, due to the brevity of Ashford University’s five-week course structure, this window of opportunity is narrow at best. Delayed instructor feedback, particularly in the first two weeks of class, can negatively impact a student’s overall performance in the class and their satisfaction with the course, the instructor, and Ashford University.
Objective
This proposal analyzes instructor response times at Ashford by comparing it with the percentage of the total course completed as well as its equivalent at traditional, 16-week colleges. It then offers a plan to improve these response times in keeping with both student and instructor preferences and suggested standards.
Sources
Due to the online nature Ashford’s courses, my primary source for instructor response times is my own experience at Ashford University. Student and instructor preferences and suggested standards come from articles within the ProQuest database located in Ashford University’s electronic Library.
Body
Details of the Problem
Each day that passes in an Ashford University course is 2.857% of the total. In a traditional, 16-week course, this would be the equivalent of 3.19 days. Several of the Ashford University instructors whom I have encountered have not posted grades for the previous week’s discussion posts and assignments until day seven of the following week. Assuming that the instructor response clock starts ticking on day one of the next week, this results in 20% of the course passing without grading-feedback. In a traditional university, this would equate to twenty-two days. Incredibly, I have waited as many as nine days at Ashford before receiving the grades for the previous week’s tasks. Following the mathematical pattern, this resulted in more than 25% of the course passing without instructor feedback on the completed work, the equivalent of four weeks at a at a traditional university.
Although Ashford University provides grading rubrics to guide student’s efforts in the absence of regular instructor contact, these rubrics are open to individual instructor interpretation of what is and is not acceptable in each area. For example: Does this instructor want a final comma in a list of three or more things (The dog, cat, and elephant went for a walk vs. the dog, cat and elephant went for a walk). Does this instructor want the “nd” or “th” superscripted in numbers like 2nd and 5th? Does this instructor have a fondness for semicolons? These are just a few examples of instructor preferences for which I have had assignment points deducted at Ashford.
As days are passing without instructor feedback, so are due dates for subsequent week’s assignments. This means that two or more week’s posts, assignments, and assessments (40% or more of the course) have been completed without the student having knowledge of the unique expectations of this instructor. The lack of knowledge of unique instructor expectancies or preferences affects grades. The potential loss of points in two weeks of a five-week course is staggering and irreplaceable. A student can easily drop to a maximum final grade of a B without ever having received any feedback from their instructor to prevent this.
Even though Ashford University provides excellent tools for instruction such writing labs, grading rubrics and audio-visual aids, these aids cannot replace the knowledge of the instructor and the benefit to the student of the instructor’s timely feedback because “Interaction between the teacher and the taught, sharing of new concepts and ideas of the teacher with the students and clarification of doubts and problems of students by the teacher is the most important part of the learning process. The best of audio-visual aid can be no substitute for a good teacher” (Meena, 2005, para. 3). Instructors themselves appreciate timely feedback in their tasks. When called upon to design online courses for a college program, 70% of the teachers who participated emphasized that regular, timely feedback was paramount to the success of their task (Oliver, Kellogg, Townsend & Brady, 2010, paras. 39 & 41). The similarity between instructor and student needs and preferences in this area is easy to ascertain.
Proposed Plan
Because of its online nature, Ashford University has thousands of instructors to draw upon for their courses. Vetting the applicants to ensure their ability and agreement to responding and grading student’s assignments within an acceptable time limit, no more than three days after a due date in my opinion, would enable Ashford to hire those who can best meet both the “Quality Matters” motto Ashford strives for and the tight timeframes required in a five-week course.
The downside to this plan is that instructors will be forced to devote large portions of every Tuesday, Wednesday, and possibly Thursday to grading tasks. Although some current instructors may dislike this tighter timeframe, and some may even find it necessary to re-exam their commitment to Ashford University, the per-day statistics previously mentioned may help them see the negative aspects of the delay and the positive aspects of the change. To help reduce the Tuesday through Thursday burden, Ashford University might consider offering extra credit for early submissions of assignments. This seems to be a logical solution as deductions of 5 or 10% are common for late work. Perhaps the same percentage increase could be offered for early submission of key assignments, allowing instructors the opportunity to get some of the grading tasks done before the Tuesday through Thursday rush.
Conclusion
Just as students must predetermine if they have the time it takes to participate in a five-week course and fulfill all of its requirements in a timely manner, so must instructors do the same. Those instructors who are able to make this commitment will likely find that they have played a large part in increasing student performance and satisfaction at Ashford University.
References
Meena, K. (2005). Web-based learning - how effective? The Hindu,p. 1. Retrieved April 3, 2011, from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=943707561&sid=2&Fmt=3&clientId= 74379&RQT=309&VName=PQD
Oliver, K., Kellogg, S., Townsend, L., & Brady, K.. (2010). Needs of elementary and middle school teachers developing online courses for a virtual school. Distance education, 31(1), 55-75. Retrieved April 3, 2011, from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb? did=2074810911 &sid=2&Fmt=3&clientId=74379&RQT=309&VName=PQD